Thursday, July 27, 2006

Enlightening the World

The Parable of the Lamp

Describe a time in your life that you were overjoyed to see a source of light.

Read Matthew 5: 14 – 16

What is similar between a follower of Jesus and a beam of photons that causes Jesus to compare the two in this story?
What are some of the costs and benefits of being a “city on a hill?”
How can we become better prepared for the attention our lives will draw as Christians?
What would be the physical results of placing a burning lamp under a bowl or a basket?
Why is Jesus using such an absurd illustration?
What are some ways that disciples hide their light in our contemporary society?
What are some “bowls” that you need to remove from your life?
A lamp’s purpose of giving light is better accomplished by being put on stand.
What is the light that Christians have been made to emanate into society?
What would be an appropriate stand on which for God to set a Christian?

Based only on this text, what is the ultimate goal for any disciple of Jesus?
What stand does God desire to set you upon?
What stand has he set our church upon?
What would you need to change in your life to increase the lumens of your lamp?

Read Mark 4:21 – 23 and Luke 8:15-17

The context of this version of the story is immediately after his “parable of the sower” which discusses how different people react to Jesus’ stories.
Compare how Jesus uses this story in these other gospels to how he used it in Matthew.
What is the light that Jesus is referring to in this version of the story?
What point is Jesus making about the disclosure of God’s Word?
How can we be sure we are open to receive the light that God’s Word offers us?

Read Luke 11: 33 – 36

The context of this use of the story is Jesus criticizing the majority of his contemporaries for not heeding his message despite everything they are witnessing.
Compare and contrast Jesus use of this story with the other uses we have seen.
What are some groups of people in life who would find no benefit in a lit lamp on a stand?
Why do people not always respond either to Jesus’ disciples or God’s Word?
If Jesus is using the concept of an “eye” metaphorically, what is he meaning by it?
How is the health of your spiritual eye? How can we improve our receptiveness to God’s light?

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Realizing Grace in Unusual Texts

I was watching a show from the History Channel a friend had TIVO'ed for me. This program discussed "Battles in the Bible" and gave some interesting description of ancient warfare. Unfortunately, the theology it presented left alot to be desired. In fact, one of the archaeologists being interviewed described God in the kind of blasphemous way only an atheist could attempt.

The question, phrased more politely, is how could a good God command the Israelites to exterminate the Caananites in the ban. How is it right for God to insist on such a genocide that even kills women, children, and animals? The "expert," however, was ignoring a great deal of the Biblical evidence in order to make his rude statements against God.

First, God's primary desire was for the Israelites to "drive out" the Caananites. A merciless attack on a series of cities would convince others of the need to move to a different area. God did want to reward his people with the land, and these kinds of land displacements were common in the Ancient Near East.

Second, and more importantly, the Caananites were under the judgment of God. Their noxious religious behavior (including ritual prostitution and child sacrifice) cried out to the Creator for judgment. God waited 400 years to give them adequate time to realize their error and repent. Finally, when God had rescued his people, the Israelites, he used them to enact the judgment, much as he could have used a tornado or a ball of fire from heaven. There are situations that cultures become so repugnant in their morality that the only just thing for them to face is destruction. Clearly, the Nazi party needed to be destroyed for their behavior, not just reformed.

The amazing thing to me is that God, in waiting 400 years to judge the Caananites, kept his own people in slavery for 400 years. That means, at great personal expense, he gave grace to the Caananites in ample opportunity to repent. How often doesn't God extend that kind of grace to us in our lives?

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

C3 Vision Poem Highlighted on the OOZE

THEOOZE - Articles: Viewing Article

C3 highlighted on local news

cbs2chicago.com - New Faithful Practice Away From Churches

Why Christians in a Post-Modern Era Should Study the Book of Numbers

23 April 2003

Growing up as a child in an evangelical Christian home, I have tried to recall all of the times that I heard a sermon or teaching concerning the fourth book in the Torah, the book of Numbers. Except for the occasional Vacation Bible School lesson about Balaam and his donkey, I cannot remember a single sermon or lesson from that book. As R. Dennis Cole cleverly points out in his commentary, “The Book of Numbers has been neglected in evangelical circles . . . Preaching from this text is relegated to the Balaam stories and oracles, the rebellious spy account, and an occasional reference to the Nazirite material to support a sermon on alcoholism.”[1] The problem with this neglect is shown by Ronald Allen’s intricate discussion against “critical ideas of source criticism” when he states in defense of the authority of the book that:

For those who take the concepts of Scripture and canon seriously, the book of Numbers may take on an increasing significance. Evangelical Christian theologians have long paraded their conviction that the Scriptures are the result of the outbreathing of God, or “inspiration.” Indeed we stand or fall on this conviction.[2]

He goes on to note that while most evangelicals would agree with the concept of the inspiration of the book of Numbers in principle, far too often they neglect it in the practical application that should be implied by it’s divine origin. To evangelicals then, contemporary application of the book of Numbers is not merely important; it is a central matter of faith.

I have faced this ignorance of the value book of Numbers in the evangelical world many times in my path towards becoming a pastor of an inner-city post-modern church-plant. In seminary besides the most general of discussions in Old Testament Survey classes, I only remember the book being significantly mentioned once.[3] During college I was involved in InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, and unfortunately, in their LifeGuides Bible study books, they do not offer a volume on the book of Numbers. Even in the world of the arts, only contemporary Christian song I heard that included a theme from the book of Numbers was the one in which Rich Mullins discusses the Balaam incident.[4] In all fairness to the evangelical world, I don’t know whether any other religious movement gives fair emphasis to this particular book of the Bible, with the possible exception of Orthodox Judaism through their intense emphasis on the entire Torah.

So, why is the book ignored by evangelicals? Allen argues that it is the plethora of critical issues that face the scholar.[5] This theory is supported by the classic introduction to the commentary put together by Driver, Plummer, and Briggs which deals exclusively with these critical issues.[6] Indeed, it is easy to get lost in the scholarly and critical issues, and miss entirely the authoritative practical applications that God desires to communicate through that part of the canon.

Along similar lines, Cole argues that the lack of application emanates a non-existent “comprehension of the composition and framework” of the book.[7] In other words, Cole thinks that Christians avoid applying the book because they have a difficult time sorting through its opaque structure. Problems in comprehending the basic elements and structure of any work can make applying it quite a bit more challenging. Perhaps, however, these problems were more severe in a modernist setting where structure and understanding of detail were held in very high esteem. Indeed, it may be easier for post-modern deconstructionists to deal with the complicated text and outline of this narrative book in the canon.

Gordon Wenham argues in the preface to his commentary that there are significant problems even with the book’s title. He states that, “in ancient times numbers were seen as mysterious and symbolic . . . . Today they are associated with computers and the depersonalization that threatens our society.”[8] Thus, the preconceived notions of what numbers mean in contemporary society and the sizable census lists in the book make studying the book a daunting challenge for some contemporary Christian exegetes.

So, for a variety of reasons, the Book of Numbers is often ignored in our churches, ministries, and Christian religious institutions. This unfortunate situation means that we are missing out on the spiritual blessings that God wants to bestow on us when we study his Scriptures.

Because of the general disregard for this book, nearly every commentary and every preacher or teacher who decides to study this book finds it necessary to discuss the merits of knowing more about this piece of “salvation history.”[9] Indeed, after a careful examination of this material, I have found that this book not only is valuable for all Christians to study but it has a special value to followers of Jesus in a post-modern society. Interestingly, B. Maarsingh does not give an argument for why the book of Numbers should be studied in the introduction to his commentary. Indeed, his sub-title and later content perhaps adequately observes the book’s importance: Numbers: a Practical Commentary.[10]

The sheer value of this work to Christians in any situation is nearly obvious once the book is studied with appropriate hermeneutics. Allen advances the idea that “the theme of the Book of Numbers is worship.”[11] While there are many different themes in this book, he has suggested one that is of importance to contemporary Christians. Indeed, with all the discussion and debate about worship in evangelical churches in the last quarter of a century, a more Scriptural study on the topic with less sheer dogma would help to put the debate in a more useful light.

Cole argues that “the cyclical structure of the contents evidence [sic.] the contrasting themes of God’s revelation and humanity’s response.”[12] Again, this significant theme in the book could be utilized in the frequent contemporary theological debates about God’s sovereignty and human responsibility. So, the value of the book to all Christians cannot only be seen in the liturgical sense that Allen mentions but also on an intentionally theological level. Indeed, this question has haunted Christian theologians for centuries, and if the book of Numbers can help find a compromise or at least a better understanding of the issue, then studying the book is clearly valuable.

R.K. Harrison quotes an old hymn about the value of the book of Numbers for evangelicals in illustrating “the Christian’s journey through life under the Lord’s guidance.”[13] This concept of hope and God’s persistent presence in the wilderness is a theme in which Christians of all eras can discover encouragement.

On a more epistemological level Philip J. Budd argues that:

The importance of the OT, as with other ancient literature, lies in the capacity to reflect at a deep level the persistent problems and aspirations of communities across the centuries and across cultures, and to speak constructively to them.[14]

Historical works have value in our everyday lives. History provides us with a laboratory to observe human behavior under specific sets of conditions. The book of Numbers gives us the story of an ancient people as they face the challenges and blessings of a life of faith. Thus, are lessons that all Christians can learn from this historical laboratory.

Beyond the value of the book of Numbers to all Christians, two authors demonstrate its particular value in a post-modern world. Dennis Olson, after describing Origen’s patristic defense of this book[15], goes on to discuss Gary Eberle’s post-modern explanation of the need for Numbers. He states that Eberle:

argues that many who live today in the so-called postmodern world have lost the sense of being rooted in a “spiritual geography” that helped previous generations... the image of traveling through the wilderness may become an important biblical image to recapture in our time.... the book of Numbers is a particularly helpful resource for recapturing this wilderness image and its many implications for a postmodern world.[16]

Thus, those of us wandering in a post-modern no-mans-land can discover a special kind of solidarity with and hope in the Hebrew people as they wander fitfully towards God’s promises. Indeed, this kind of hope even in the face of rebellion, difficulty, and disappointment, is something post-modern Christians need. In the wilderness God is not only aiding his followers and pointing them towards their ultimate hope but is also present with them in a special and visible way.

Perhaps the best demonstration of the value of the book of Numbers to post-modern Christians comes quite unintentionally in Gordon Wenham’s commentary. He discusses in detail the value of rituals in the Torah and his anthropological method for understanding them.[17] In the middle of his discussion he notes the following:

Though these rituals may be likened to television, the analogy is rather weak. Television may be vivid, but it does not permit spectator participation, which is the essence of Old Testament rituals. Everyone involved had to play his own role on a public stage under the eyes of man and God.[18]

Indeed, in many ways Old Testament rituals are more closely related to virtual reality video games or even reality television (where the audience votes for the winner) than they are to regular network TV. Not only do they “express religious truths visually as opposed to verbally,”[19] but they involve the ‘audience’ in the reality of what is occurring. Leonard Sweet, both in many of his published works (including Soul Tsunami) and in a lecture he presented, argues that worship in a post-modern world must include experience, participation, imagery, and community (EPIC).[20] The worship rituals described in Numbers include all of these aspects that post-moderns find vital. So as evangelical Christians are actively rethinking what their worship event should be in post-modern context, it would be wise to study the book of Numbers (and the rest of the Torah) and observe how God used these very elements in the ancient past to help his tribal people connect with him.

Therefore, the book of Numbers not only has value as an important piece of history and a book with themes that are generally encouraging to all Christians, but a couple of its central themes, participatory worship and wilderness wandering, are particularly and spiritually vital to those in the post-modern world. This should not be surprising to evangelicals, who have said all along with the Apostle Paul, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.”[21] May God always bless the study of His Word with practical applications that transform our lives, no matter what context in which we find ourselves!


[1] R. Dennis Cole, Numbers, The New American Commentary, Volume 3B, Nashville: Broadman, 2000, page 16.
[2] Ronald B. Allen, Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Volume 2, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1990, pages 658 – 659.
[3] Dr. Calvin Miller applied its generational theme to the tensions between “Baby Boomers” and “genXers” in the contemporary church. Dr. Calvin Miller, Church Growth Evangelism Class, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, lectures spring 1999.
[4] Rich Mullins, “Who God is Going to Use.” The World As Best as I Can Remember It, Edward Grant, 1991. He also refers to the pillar and cloud that shows up througout the Torah in "Every where I go I see you."
[5] Allen, 658.
[6] S.R. Driver, A. Plummer, C.A.Briggs, Numbers, International Critical Commentary, Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1903, 1986.
[7] Cole, 16.
[8] Gordon J. Wenham, Numbers, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, Volume 4, Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1981, page 9.
[9] Allen, 657.
[10] B.Marrsingh, Numbers: A Practical Commentary, Trans.by John Vriend, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987.
[11] Allen, 658.
[12] Cole, 52.
[13] R.K. Harrison, Numbers, Wycliffe Exegetical Commentary, Chicago: Moody Press, 1990, page 28.
[14] Philip J. Budd, Numbers, Word Biblical Commentary, Volume 5, Waco, TX: Word, 1984, page xxxi.
[15] Dennis T. Olson, Numbers, Interpretation, Louisville: John Knox, 1986, page 1.
[16] Olson, 2.
[17] Wenham, 32.
[18] Wenham, 29.
[19] Wenham, 29.
[20] Leonard Sweet, Lecture at Northwood a Church of the Communities, Texas, May 2000.
[21] 2 Timothy 3: 16 – 17, New International Version, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995.

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Vision Poem for C3

The pulses of originality beat

Art and wonder, grime and horror are here

The angry scream, the hopeless drink their fear

Here in this unique place the tribes all meet

The pounding of a million wing-tipped feet

Rushing from the train to their home that’s near

In fatigue they stop to enjoy a beer

The aggrandized have their lazy-boy seat

Yet He still haunts the alleys and the lights

Longing to woo them to his bleeding arms

And give them what they forget they long for

Teaching them joy in surrendering rights

Endowing peace in the midst of alarms

We will show them how to open the door.

Pluralism and the Emerging Church

I am the pastor of a small church in center city Chicago. My wife and I moved to Chicago 6 years ago to start this church. In some ways I suppose we are what would be called an “emerging church.” We host a quarterly goth night, we look for many other creative ways to reach out to this highly post-modern, post-Christian, post-gentrification culture, we value relationships and sincerity. In other ways I am sure we are dinosaurs: we have use of a church building, I minister in the church full time, we have a cell group outreach strategy, our worship service has some traditional evangelical elements to it, and we even have a purpose statement (though in fairness to us it is focused on discipleship). Despite these idiosyncrasies, I am now often encouraged to speak in various arenas (research, media, denominational associations, sponsoring churches) concerning the emerging church.

With this new found voice, I figured it would be wise for me to become better versed in emerging lingo. In the past reading articles on the OOZE has sufficed, but I supposed that I needed something slightly more academically intense. I picked up Brian McLaren’s work a Generous Orthodoxy and began to read looking for some kind of theological explanation of this movement in which we currently find ourselves.

What I found instead was what I consider the most important topic for us to begin to actually discuss in this emerging dialogue. While some of what he mentioned demonstrated his basic genius and good humor, much of his argument drifted disturbingly close to pluralism. In the name of being friendly, he almost dismissed the uniqueness of Jesus’ work through his bride the Church (check out chapter 17). Now, I fully understand the warnings against uber-critique in his chapter 0, but I also sensed in his tone a desire to spark conversation. Perhaps this would be a good forum to reopen that dialogue.

In chapter 8 (pages 145 and forward) McLaren argues that what polarized the church in the hyper-conceptualist modern era was our view of the authority of the Scriptures. He argued that both fundamentalists and liberals were trying in their own ways to address the basic questions of modernity through using modernity’s own tools. Perhaps a similar polarization lies in the future of the emerging movement. Let’s hope we can have a more healthy and productive dialogue than the debates that erupted in the modern era. Beyond that, however, let’s pray that we take as seriously as the modern evangelicals the preserving of the uniqueness of the Christian faith. Evangelicals offer more than just their passion that he discusses in chapter 7. They made many mistakes, and I am sure we are making many now, but over all it is fairly impressive that Christianity survived the modern threat, and much of that we owe to the tenacity of the “fundamentalists.”

The polarization I expect in the emerging dialogue will come down to this question: Is a relationship with Jesus in the context of the Christian community the only way to experience Jesus’ offer of eternal life? Note that this question is far more relational in nature than what our forbearers debated. Are we going to be wholeheartedly loyal to Jesus as his disciples, or are we going to open ourselves up to gaining spirituality from various other religious and secular sources?

Clearly the issue of pluralism –vs- exclusivism is not one we can avoid, especially as we reach out to people who have been deeply impacted by other religious systems. We can either choose to absorb their beliefs and practices and become a kind of religious buffet, or we can challenge their sub-Christian values (as we do our own worldly values) with intentional relational discipleship. We hope and pray that as our dialogue continues the emerging movement will lean more and more towards an exclusive focus on Jesus. While other religious should be treated respectfully, and at times may have some wisdom to offer (all truth is God’s truth), they simply are not completely affirming to the basic teachings and attitudes that Jesus desires for his disciples to reflect. As his disciples we are required to treat people with true love… a loving response when someone is mistaken in their core beliefs is to gently and relationally confront those issues, and help them discover the truth, not to simply leave them where they are.

If you want what Jesus offers, you can only get that through who he is and what he has done.

NIV Acts 4:12 Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved."