Tuesday, December 19, 2006

On Celebrating Jesus' Birthday

(Picture of the hillsides around Bethlehem in March)

Holidays in our culture often seem to miss the point. Why do we celebrate our thanks by eating a lot of turkey and watching football? Why do we celebrate romantic love with chocolate? Why do we celebrate the joy of working by taking a day off? Most importantly in this current season why do we celebrate a homeless preacher's birthday who spent his life declaring "good news to the poor" by giving those close to us expensive gifts. If any holiday should not be materialistic Christmas should be that holiday. It seems as if the holiday has been captured by marketing experts.

Indeed, Jesus probably was not born in the month of December at all. To the frustration of my brother who was born on December 25th, I always remind him that my birthday April 2 was probably closer to Jesus' actual date of birth. This is based on what we find the shepherds doing in the account of the Nativity recorded in the Gospel of Luke in the New Testament. Early Christians preempted this date to help their recent converts not revert back to paganism in celebrating the holidays around the winter solstice. Indeed, a good work of missiology, but not terribly historically accurate.

Perhaps now that the marketing experts have taken the "holidays" back from us it would be a good time for us as followers of Jesus to pick a new date (sometime in late March or early April) to celebrate Jesus' birthday that would be closer to the historical reality, and further from the consumerist pollution of the date. Better yet, perhaps it would be important for us to find new more meaningful ways to celebrate Christmas and seize the holiday back from the marketing experts. Let me suggest this as one idea: Jesus, the "Bread of Life" was born in "the House of Bread" Bethlehem in a feeding trough. Perhaps we could celebrate his birthday best by giving a gift to him on his birthday (fancy that thought) and helping feed someone who is hungry. After all he says: (NIV Matthew 25:40) 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'

Here are some organizations you could donate towards or volunteer at to help those in need as a birthday gift for Jesus: Salvation Army, Chicagoland Community Church (my church), Feed the Children, World Hunger and Relief Funds, etc. Obviously, there are many other options. The important thing is to find an organization you trust and give generously towards those who are in need. Better yet, get to know someone in need yourself and find ways to directly bless them. Either way, make sure to add Jesus to your Christmas giving list, after all, it is his birthday.

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

Returning Home


Luke 15: 11 - 32

This extremely popular story of Jesus’ is set in the daily life of Palestinian Jews in the first century. Generations of Christian artists have produce works depicting this story in music (check out "Growing Young" in Rich Mullins website)or on canvas. Younger sons could expect to inherit half of what the eldest son would inherit from the father. More often than not, however, those interpreting this passage miss including one of the major characters in their explanation. We will look at them each, and study the passage in its context, to best understand how to apply the principles Jesus is teaching in these stories to our lives. Please join the conversation through comments.

When is a time in your life you most felt like you were heading home? Develop for me the character of the younger son in the story. Why does the younger son leave his home in the first place? What causes him to go through such a radical personal transformation? What transformation do you need in your life? What circumstances, memories, and experiences in your life are being used to guide you towards repentance?

What do we discover about the father throughout this story? What phrases or scenes in particular reveal the father’s worldview? Why is the father so generous with the younger son when he returns? What is Jesus saying about his Father in this description? Spend some time thanking God for the mercy he demonstrates to those who have made bad choices in their lives.

How would you describe the older son in the story? Why is he so concerned about the mercy his father is showing to the younger son? What evidence demonstrates his concerns are either legitimate or ill-conceived? How well do his arguments resonate with your own attitudes and perspectives? Describe the answer his father gives him. Do you think he finally goes into the party, Why? How can we as Christians become less judgmental of those who are coming to God for mercy?

Compare and contrast this story with the stories from last week. How do the characters in the story parallel those involved in Jesus’ ministry? How can we be sure we respond to God more in a spirit of humble repentance than with an attitude of haughty superiority?

Wednesday, December 06, 2006

What Causes Heaven to Party

Luke 15:1-10


When is a time that you lost something that was very important to you? What did you do?

Describe the attitude the religious are having towards Jesus’ relationships with those who are undesirable? Why are they so put off by Jesus’ relationships with that type of people? How can we make sure we don’t become spiritually jealous?

In the first story Jesus tells, how would it feel to have been a shepherd missing a sheep? What risks are inherent in leaving the 99 alone in open country? Why would the shepherd be willing to accept those risks in order to help and individual sheep?

In the second story, imagine you are the woman missing an important coin. Describe the process you would take to try to find the coin in your home. Why might it be so important for this woman to find this coin?

Compare the responses the people have in the two stories when they find what is lost. Why such levity? Why is it so vital for them to include others in on the celebration?

What connection does Jesus draw between the celebrations in his story and celebrations in heaven? What really makes heaven party? Why does heaven celebrate the repentance of a sinner? How does this answer the criticism them religious leaders are leveling against him?

What efforts are you taking to seek those who need God in their lives?

What could we do more as a group to bring the gospel to those folks who people would not expect to believe?

How do you celebrate the deliverance Jesus has given you in your life? What should we do as a group to celebrate when people come to know Jesus? Why should we celebrate salvation?

Monday, December 04, 2006

Now members of....

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

What it Costs to Be a Jesus Follower Part 2

These are continuing discussion questions from our Wednesday night C3 Context Group. Please join in on the conversation through the comment capacity on this blog!

Why does Jesus state the seemingly ridiculous and impossible demands of verses 26 -27 when he has a large crowd that is coming after him? What does Jesus mean by hating those who are close to us? Who or what are some things in your life you tend to value more than the Kingdom?

What would it have meant to the first hearers to hear they should carry their cross? What does it really mean to follow Jesus? Why are we uncomfortable with the idea?

Compare the two little stories Jesus tells as examples in verses 28 – 32. How would each character feel at the end of their story? What would be some contemporary illustrations of the principle Jesus is teaching? What are the costs of being a disciple of Jesus? How do you “give up everything” to Jesus? What are some things that you need to surrender to him in order to better follow him?

How are these statements Jesus is making parallel to the earlier banquet story?

We know NaCl does not break down. Is Jesus a bad chemist, or how does salt degenerate? Compare and contrast a useful disciple and a non-useful disciple. How mixed is your time and priorities? How can you simplify your life to be more useful?

Saturday, November 18, 2006

What it Costs to Be a Jesus Follower

Luke 14: 15 - 35

What is the most costly event you have ever attended?

What does the exclamation of the man in verse 15 show us about the crowd at the house? Why do you think Jesus decides to tell another banquet story in this setting? Compare the different excuses people give for not being able to attend the banquet. Why is the owner of the house so upset about people not attending? Why does the owner decide to invite random hurting people from the community? For what reasons do the hurting people come and attend the banquet? Who does Jesus consider to be the first people invited to the banquet of the Kingdom? Who does Jesus consider to be the hurting people who end up taking part? How can we make sure we do not suffer the fate of exclusion the first people faced? Who do we need to invite to the Kingdom banquet who might be surprised they are invited? How are you going to go about making that invitation this week?

To be continued….

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Interfaith Blog Event #3 - A Most Valuable Ritual

This article is representing a protestant Christian perspective as part of an interfaith dialogue discussing the question: Within your religious traditions, what rituals and/or traditions give you a sense of connection to your fellow congregants, beliefs, and communities? What actions do you take to ensure the stability of those connections? Do you feel that the connections that have been made are sufficient for your spiritual and/or religious needs? Other perspectives from different faiths are presented by Unknowing Mind (Buddhist) and Sojourner (Pagan)

Jesus loved to party. That may come as a surprise to some who have well designed preconceptions of the Master's demeanor and habits based on some of the attitudes some of his followers display sometimes, but especially as his life is recorded in the Gospel of Luke Jesus always seems to have a leg of lamb in one hand and some fruit of the vine in the other. Clearly, he was not a glutton or a drunk, but his reputation for enjoying a good time proceeded him, and was often exaggerated in the process. The simple fact is that Jesus valued relationship. He loved people, and he loved all kinds of people. He could be found hanging out with religious elites, and prostitutes, and oppressive IRS-type agents, and union-type fishermen, and rich dudes, and the terminally ill (though he often changed that), and the poor, and Roman soldiers, etc...

Because of that it is highly apropos and rather touching that the central ritual of the Christian faith, and by that I can confidently say all branches of the Christian faith, though how they interpret the celebration varies greatly, is the Lord's Table. This event goes by many names in the Christian community: Eucharist, Communion, the Lord's Supper, a Love Feast, etc. I will not go into details on the specifics of how any particular tradition practices the event. First, that would be a very daunting process and take a long time for you to read, but second, out of respect for the individual traditions it is important that people experience the Lord's Supper as disciples of Jesus or observe it as seekers rather than merely hearing it described "objectively". I suppose this my respecting the ancient Christian tradition of the "discipline of the secret." On top of that, I do not wish to bore you with comparisons of different "substantiation" theological theories, though if you know the debates and observe my terminology you could probably construct the fact that I view the Supper as a powerful symbol of a discipling community's relationship with Jesus.

There are a number of things that are taught directly through the celebration of the Supper, however, that are helpful in answering the question at hand. First, the Supper is an act of Thanksgiving to God for his provision of forgiveness and relationship in the death and resurrection of Jesus. Second, the Supper recognizes the unity of common love that followers of Jesus (both globally and historically) share because of our common experience of deliverance. Third, the Supper memorializes what Jesus did on the cross in a very existential, kinesthetic, and timeless kind of way. Fourth, the Supper is an act of hope awaiting the wonderful things that Jesus will do in the future. Fifth, the Supper recognizes the daily provision of grace to meet our spiritual needs that Jesus offers. Sixth, it is an opportunity for disciples to practice a time of introspection and ensure that their relationships with Jesus and each other are healthy. Seventh, if done in conjunction with a more complete meal the Supper can actually be an opportunity to build relationships with other people who are Jesus followers. Eighth, the Supper reminds us of our historical connections to God's people in ancient Israel (the Supper was first celebrated during a Passover meal), Finally, non-Christian seekers who are observing at a Supper event receive a clear visual and auditory proclamation of the message and acts of Jesus.

Of all of the different faith acts that Christians do, the Supper is probably the most meaningful in accomplishing simultaneously all the different goals mentioned in the question. Because it is practiced by the actual local gathering of disciples and not merely by an individual it reflects the Christian focus on the whole person including their relationships. It undoubtedly helps connect with other disciples, reinforces Christian teachings, and can renew a focus on serving the world. Because the Supper is taken frequently (how frequently varies by tradition and individual church) the lessons that it teaches are confirmed and established perpetually in the lives of disciples.

As for the sufficiency aspect mentioned in the question, clearly all Christian faith acts are more than sufficient from God's part of the equation (obviously, that is the whole point of grace), but the question comes down to the attitude of the individual disciple. It should be noted, that rituals in and of themselves accomplish absolutely nothing of spiritual value. An Christian act such as the Supper, that is done with an attitude of trust (faith), however, can have a highly meaningful impact on the life of the person who is experiencing it. I know that because I have experienced that before myself, and many fellow disciples share that same experience.

I apologize for an overabundance of technical jargon in this blog entry. That is, however, part of the nature of dealing with a topic of this detail. Thank you for a very good question! I look forward to the dialog that will follow in the comment section. I hope some day (either in this age or the next) to celebrate the Supper with any of you who are or become followers of Jesus. For those of you who do not yet know him, we would be happy to share a meal now with you as well, I share my Master's fondness for dining!

"For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you: The Lord Jesus on the night he was betrayed, took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me." In the same way after supper he took the cup, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me." For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes." [NIV 1Corinthians 11: 23 - 36, the words of the Apostle Paul c.60AD]

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Interfaith Blog Event #2: Ethics, Intrinsic or Relative?

This article is representing a protestant Christian perspective as part of an interfaith dialogue discussing the question: Is there anything that you consider to be intrinsically right or intrinsically wrong? What grounds do you have for coming to that conclusion? How does the concept of morality impact your everyday life? Other perspectives from different faiths are presented by Unknowing Mind (Buddhist) and Sojourner (Pagan)

C. S. Lewis, in his work "Mere Christianity," argues that humans live under a kind of natural law. That when we tell someone that they are wrong we mean something more profound than mere aesthetic decisions. For example, if you tell a friend that they were wrong for lying to you, you mean more than if you say, "I like chocolate ice cream" or "the color red is the best." That may be hard for us to understand in a culture that insists on the relativism of all ethics, but even in our culture there are still things that are seen to be indefensible. Most people would agree with the statement "It is always wrong to be intolerant." But, if you press people as to WHY that statement is wrong they will say something vague about the "common good" or "peace and harmony" but they have no real ground for their ethical claim. Lewis point out that while we may disagree on the specific content of our moral law, we all claim a moral law nonetheless. That begs the question: what possibly could be suitable grounds for a moral law? Clearly our perspectives on this law can be different, we can disagree or even warp ourselves into thinking that something wrong is actually right, but in the end we all assume in our use of language that there really is a right or wrong somewhere out there in the objective world.

This actually leads us to a very interesting argument: If there is an internal moral law that requires a legislature bigger than ourselves (otherwise it is merely an aesthetic choice). If we are to hold society and nations to the same standard of justice, we are therefore looking to a lawgiver bigger than societies and nations. Natural selection could not account for the arising of a moral law, indeed, often it would seem a person or society much more survivable without a sense of morality. In fact, if we are honest with ourselves we all seem to be in a bit of a paradox (that Lewis also points out), we often do things that are natural to us, but that we know by our internal law that they are wrong. This draws us deductively towards the conclusion which the ancient Hebrews were given:

And God spoke all these words: "I am the LORD your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the land of slavery. "[1] You shall have no other gods before me. [2] "You shall not make for yourself an idol .... [3] "You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, .... [4] "Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy.... [5] "Honor your father and your mother,... [6]"You shall not murder. [7] "You shall not commit adultery. [8] "You shall not steal. [9] "You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor. [10] "You shall not covet your neighbor's house.... [excerpts from NIV Exodus 20: 1 - 17]

An old mentor of mine once said that God did not give us his law to "rain on our parade." God gave us his law because it simply is the best way for us to live. Rob Bell, in his work "Velvet Elvis," discusses the law of God in these kinds of terms as well. Think about it, don't God's values make the most sense Being careful of what we say about and attribute to God is very wise. Taking a break each week to refocus is extremely healthy. Treating your parents with honor confirms your own existance. Respecting human life is obviously important. Placing value on the relationship of marriage is the only way to make a marriage work. Being honest is particularly important when in a court of law. It is a rotten way to live always wishing you had someone else's life, or trying to take someone else's stuff. These things are not rocket-science, but they are shockingly difficult to incorporate into life no matter how intuitive they are. Perhaps that is why the ancient sage said:

The law of the LORD is perfect, reviving the soul. The statutes of the LORD are trustworthy, making wise the simple. The precepts of the LORD are right, giving joy to the heart. The commands of the LORD are radiant, giving light to the eyes. The fear of the LORD is pure, enduring forever. The ordinances of the LORD are sure and altogether righteous. They are more precious than gold, than much pure gold; they are sweeter than honey, than honey from the comb. By them is your servant warned; in keeping them there is great reward. [NIV Psalm 19:7-11]

Now Plato raised the question (he actually attributed it to Socrates), How can God be declared good and at the same time be the one who is defining good. While this is a very clever logical riddle (much like Xeno's paradox), indeed it is impossible to imagine how it could be otherwise. What does the law say about God? Parents who give their children good rules show that they care about their children, and ultimately, show that they are (at least to some degree) good and wise people. Christianity, however, offers an even deeper and more profound answer to that riddle. Jesus summarizes the law in the following way:

"'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments." [NIV Matthew 22: 36 - 40]

Indeed, at the core of all the commandments is God's primary value: sacrificial love in relationship. The Christian doctrine of God insists that he is a Trinity. That means the Father loved the Son loved the Spirit in perfect relationship for all of eternity. If that is the case, than the law which God commands for us to follow is an extrapolation on who he is by nature. Therefore, his good law is based upon his good nature. The ground for Christian ethics lies in the nature of God. He is good in that he always remains faithful to his loving nature, and his law is consistant with that nature.
Justify FullAs a follower of Jesus, God's law effects me in two ways. First, it shows me the areas in my life where I am in need of the forgiveness that Jesus offers. It demonstrates to me the things that I have done wrong, and gives me to opportunity to receive God's grace. Second, as the Holy Spirit works in my life I more and more begin to value the the things that God values. He slowly transforms the Christian's life into one that better reflects the things God finds important. As
He does that I find more and more the truth of how truly beneficial His law is.



Wednesday, September 27, 2006

The Benefits of Following Jesus

In my recent blogging discussions on various other blogs people asked for what I mean by congenial exclusivism. Ultimately, I argue that Jesus offers things that no other religious system offers, and that you can only get those things through a trust relationship with Jesus. Some of those benefits are eternal in scope (the age to come) and some of them are temporal (relating to this age).

NIV Acts 4:12 Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved.

That of course leaves open to discussion what Salvation entails. I will do my best to detail some of what that rich theological term implies. Here are some of the benefits that I can enumerate off of the top of my head, in no particular order:

1) Jesus allows us to remain individual persons and yet have a communal relationship with God and others who have that relatinship with him.
2) Jesus takes the real concepts of evil, injustice, sin, etc. seriously yet offers an opportunity for us to receive true, absolute, and unlimited forgiveness. That by the way, makes a relationship with the holy God possible. He accomplished this by paying the penalty for our sin himself on the cross.
3) Jesus understands the fallness of human nature (much worse than elves chasing Fenor's jewels for those of you who are geeks) yet offers the opportunity to actually change human nature through the power of his Holy Spirit.
4) Jesus grounds his ethical expectations of us soundly on the biblical concept of love, yet perfectly demonstrates what God's love is truly about through his own actions on our behalf .

C.S. Lewis and other Christian thinkers have long argued that these are some of the truly unique aspects of mere Christianity. To receive these things means to experience eternal life (starting in this age and going into the next), and to not receive these things means to experience eternal judgement (starting in this age and going into the next). These are offered to everyone because of God's grace and his sincere love, even though we certainly do not deserve them. No one, however, is forced to receive these things, that is their choice to be made in this age of this temporal world.

Each of these indeed deserve a blog article of their own, and probably will receive them in the months to come. Also I am sure I will think of others and continue to add them as they come to mind.

Sunday, September 17, 2006

Relgious Diversity

I was a guest blogger for my buddhist friend Mike. Check out my article at Unknowing Mind.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Interfaith Dialogue Topic #1: Karma

This article is representing a protestant Christian perspective as part of an interfaith dialogue discussing the question: "How do you view karma, the thought that your actions in some way determine your experience, in your spiritual path?" Other perspectives from different faiths are presented by Unknowing Mind (Buddhist) and Sojourner (Pagan)

The concept of Karma seems to have saturated contemporary American culture. Earl has merged the concept with redneck mores, and in misleading billboards insurance companies mangle the concept beyond recognition. Perhaps this is betraying an underlying desire or expectation for justice in our culture. As a Christian scholar I do not consider myself an expert on this topic of karma. But given the infinite spiritual scope of the Book in which I do claim some kind of expertise, an interesting question arises: What, if anything, do the Christian Scriptures say about this concept of karma? I should also make one additional disclaimer: much of what I am about to express has been shaped by various professors and commentaries that I have studied. Clearly this is not a strictly academic piece or I would attempt to cite those sources, but we are all indebted to those who have taught us.

For a moment, picture yourself in the ancient near-east. You are an Israelite, your world revolves around the challenges of ancient agriculture, the realities of ancient local politics, and the glimmer of hope you glean from your tri-annual journeys in festival to YHWH. For you the known world ends with the Philistines to your west, the Egyptians to the south, the Mesopotamians to your "north" and the mysterious desert to your east. The "wild - west" of the Israelites was across the
Jordan River to the east, and beyond was the world of the rising sun. I took us on this brief journey into this alien world simply so we could get our minds around one concept: for the Israelites wisdom was nearly synonymous with the east.

It does not surprise me to find parallels in ancient Israelite wisdom literature and some of the teachings that arise in the
Far East. There is particularly a strong parallel between the eastern concept of karma and the concept from biblical principle that "you reap what you sow." Though perhaps more interesting are the bounds and limits that the Scriptures place around these teachings of wisdom. Most interesting of all are the exceptions the Scriptures give to these general principles of wisdom, and the critique those exceptions bring to the concept of karma.

Parallels between Karma and Wisdom

A brief caveat should be made at this point. While I will demonstrate some parallels between the concept of Karma and biblical wisdom, they are not identical in their scope or definition. The Scriptures are deeply concerned about ethical and moral goodness and badness. These principles are defined by theological terms: wickedness and righteousness. Righteousness means to be relationally faithful to the agreements one makes, whether with God or with other people. Wickedness means the opposite: to be crooked in how one relates with other people and God.

Biblical wisdom points out the truth that the world was originally created to be good to those who are righteous (bless them) and to be bad to those who are wicked (curse them). This was to occur not in a context of reincarnation, since the Scriptures never mention that concept, instead focusing on the miracle of resurrection, but primarily it was to be experienced in this life and by one's descendents.

There are many examples of this principle in the wisdom literature of the Old Testament. Here are two brief passages that are demonstrative of the genre:
Many are the woes of the wicked, but the LORD's unfailing love surrounds the man who trusts in him.

[NIV Psalm 32:10]
The fear of the LORD adds length to life, but the years of the wicked are cut short. The prospect of the righteous is joy, but the hopes of the wicked come to nothing. The way of the LORD is a refuge for the righteous, but it is the ruin of those who do evil. The righteous will never be uprooted, but the wicked will not remain in the land. [NIV Proverbs 10: 27 - 30]

This principle can even be seen in the New Testament writings of the Apostle Paul:
Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up. [NIV Gal 6: 7 - 9]

Thus, the Bible teaches that in general those who do bad things gain bad consequences in this life, and those who do good things gain good consequences in this life. God created the world originally with that basic design in mind.

Biblical Limits on Wisdom Literature


While biblical wisdom literature does imply that the righteous will be blessed and the wicked will be cursed, there are limits to that principle. The Scriptures recognize that we live in a fallen and broken world. Our evil impacts the suffering of others, and sometimes in this temporal existence, there is no clear explanation for why a particular kind of suffering exists. We have polluted the moral world system God originally created, and at times in this world injustice seems to at least temporarily flourish. The Bible reserves much of the ultimate blessing and cursing individuals receive for the eternal realm of the resurrection.

In the biblical story of Job we find a man who is caught up in horrific circumstances that happen to him primarily because of a kind of cosmic wager going on in heaven. His friends try to quote to him the contemporary wisdom. Perhaps his unrighteousness is coming back to get him? But Job holds to his integrity, refusing to acquiesce to primary culpability in his current situation. While not a perfect man, he asserts that he has done nothing that would merit the kind of suffering he is now facing. In the end, God confirms his perspective and disagrees with Job's friends: "My servant Job will pray for you, and I will accept his prayer and not deal with you according to your folly. You have not spoken of me what is right, as my servant Job has." [NIV Job 42:8]

Jesus obviously is the example of the righteous sufferer par-excellence. In the book of Isaiah it reads: He was assigned a grave with the wicked, and with the rich in his death, though he had done no violence, nor was any deceit in his mouth. [NIV Isaiah 53:9] This Old Testament passage was taken as a prophetic foretelling concerning Jesus by many of the early Christian writers. Jesus' unjust death being executed through the cruel Roman method of crucifixion clearly was not something that he personally deserved as the concept of karma would imply. Religious leaders involved in his execution used contemporary wisdom to mock him:
"He saved others," they said, "but he can't save himself! He's the King of Israel! Let him come down now from the cross, and we will believe in him. He trusts in God. Let God rescue him now if he wants him, for he said, 'I am the Son of God.'" [NIV Matthew 27: 42-43] The resurrection of Jesus from the dead clearly demonstrates that God was vindicating him. God proved by bringing Jesus back from the dead that the suffering Jesus faced was not due to any moral defect (which in fact, Jesus had none) but instead was on the behalf of others. In that amazing act God clearly traced the limits of wisdom and outlined the border of grace.

A Brief Philosophical Critique of the Concept of Karma

In the end, the unique biblical concept of grace runs counter stream to most wisdom, especially any sense of karma. Perhaps that is why the apostle Paul states in reference to the crucifixion of Jesus: "For it is written: "I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate." Where is the wise man? Where is the scholar? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world? .... For the foolishness of God is wiser than man's wisdom, and the weakness of God is stronger than man's strength.' [1Cor 1:19 - 25]

Indeed, that is the most amazing aspect of the good news about Jesus. Because of Jesus' death we can receive forgiveness for our bad choices. We can thereby avoid the ultimate and eternal negative results of our negative actions simply by accepting that Jesus took those results upon himself for us. This does not mean that we never face any consequences for our behavior in this life, but it does mean that the worst of possible consequences, a destroyed relationship with God, can be avoided by anyone who places their trust in Jesus. Thus, the costly bill of our unrighteousness, injustice, hate, and evil has been paid by Jesus in his death. This reversal of "karma," or rather this folly of pure love is available to anyone who will trust in Jesus.

Friday, September 08, 2006

C3 Band CD Release Coming Soon!


The C3 Band has finally received its completed professionally produced CD featuring 5 original songs by the 2006 class of the C3 Band. This CD is available for free to all members, guests, and sponsors of C3. Contact alana@chicagolandcc.org if you are interested in being added to the newsletter mailing list and receiving a free copy of our new CD.

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

Home Makeover: Spiritual Edition

The Parable of House Foundations

What is the most complicated home improvement project you have ever attempted?

Read Matthew 7: 24 -28
This story comes at the end of Jesus “Sermon on the Mount” where he defines the expectations he has for his disciples.What similarities are there between building a house and living life? Compare and contrast the wise man and the foolish man.
What does the rock symbolize in Jesus’ story? What does the sand symbolize in Jesus’ story?
Why would anyone be silly enough to build a house on a beach?
Why would anyone not take the time to ensure their house had a good foundation?
What are some times in your life that worldly values or spiritual laziness drew you away from what you knew God was calling you to do?
What are some of the storms that we face in our lives that test the depth of our faith?
How “weatherproof” have you found your life to be in the past?

How does obedience to Jesus’ teaching add stability to the lives of his disciples?
Pause and ask Jesus for the strength to choose to obey him.

How does a failure to obey Jesus set a disciple up for failure?
What teachings of Jesus do you find particularly difficult to obey?
How can you more easily surrender to Jesus’ demands on your life?

Read Luke 6:47-49
What are some different details in this version of Jesus’ story?
How does a relationship with Jesus act as a foundation in our lives?
Why would Jesus choose to use “well built” as a metaphor for a healthy spiritual life?
How have you seen Jesus build your life through obedience to his word?
What is Jesus’ perspective on his own teachings? What does this show us about Jesus?

Thursday, July 27, 2006

Enlightening the World

The Parable of the Lamp

Describe a time in your life that you were overjoyed to see a source of light.

Read Matthew 5: 14 – 16

What is similar between a follower of Jesus and a beam of photons that causes Jesus to compare the two in this story?
What are some of the costs and benefits of being a “city on a hill?”
How can we become better prepared for the attention our lives will draw as Christians?
What would be the physical results of placing a burning lamp under a bowl or a basket?
Why is Jesus using such an absurd illustration?
What are some ways that disciples hide their light in our contemporary society?
What are some “bowls” that you need to remove from your life?
A lamp’s purpose of giving light is better accomplished by being put on stand.
What is the light that Christians have been made to emanate into society?
What would be an appropriate stand on which for God to set a Christian?

Based only on this text, what is the ultimate goal for any disciple of Jesus?
What stand does God desire to set you upon?
What stand has he set our church upon?
What would you need to change in your life to increase the lumens of your lamp?

Read Mark 4:21 – 23 and Luke 8:15-17

The context of this version of the story is immediately after his “parable of the sower” which discusses how different people react to Jesus’ stories.
Compare how Jesus uses this story in these other gospels to how he used it in Matthew.
What is the light that Jesus is referring to in this version of the story?
What point is Jesus making about the disclosure of God’s Word?
How can we be sure we are open to receive the light that God’s Word offers us?

Read Luke 11: 33 – 36

The context of this use of the story is Jesus criticizing the majority of his contemporaries for not heeding his message despite everything they are witnessing.
Compare and contrast Jesus use of this story with the other uses we have seen.
What are some groups of people in life who would find no benefit in a lit lamp on a stand?
Why do people not always respond either to Jesus’ disciples or God’s Word?
If Jesus is using the concept of an “eye” metaphorically, what is he meaning by it?
How is the health of your spiritual eye? How can we improve our receptiveness to God’s light?

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Realizing Grace in Unusual Texts

I was watching a show from the History Channel a friend had TIVO'ed for me. This program discussed "Battles in the Bible" and gave some interesting description of ancient warfare. Unfortunately, the theology it presented left alot to be desired. In fact, one of the archaeologists being interviewed described God in the kind of blasphemous way only an atheist could attempt.

The question, phrased more politely, is how could a good God command the Israelites to exterminate the Caananites in the ban. How is it right for God to insist on such a genocide that even kills women, children, and animals? The "expert," however, was ignoring a great deal of the Biblical evidence in order to make his rude statements against God.

First, God's primary desire was for the Israelites to "drive out" the Caananites. A merciless attack on a series of cities would convince others of the need to move to a different area. God did want to reward his people with the land, and these kinds of land displacements were common in the Ancient Near East.

Second, and more importantly, the Caananites were under the judgment of God. Their noxious religious behavior (including ritual prostitution and child sacrifice) cried out to the Creator for judgment. God waited 400 years to give them adequate time to realize their error and repent. Finally, when God had rescued his people, the Israelites, he used them to enact the judgment, much as he could have used a tornado or a ball of fire from heaven. There are situations that cultures become so repugnant in their morality that the only just thing for them to face is destruction. Clearly, the Nazi party needed to be destroyed for their behavior, not just reformed.

The amazing thing to me is that God, in waiting 400 years to judge the Caananites, kept his own people in slavery for 400 years. That means, at great personal expense, he gave grace to the Caananites in ample opportunity to repent. How often doesn't God extend that kind of grace to us in our lives?

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

C3 Vision Poem Highlighted on the OOZE

THEOOZE - Articles: Viewing Article

C3 highlighted on local news

cbs2chicago.com - New Faithful Practice Away From Churches

Why Christians in a Post-Modern Era Should Study the Book of Numbers

23 April 2003

Growing up as a child in an evangelical Christian home, I have tried to recall all of the times that I heard a sermon or teaching concerning the fourth book in the Torah, the book of Numbers. Except for the occasional Vacation Bible School lesson about Balaam and his donkey, I cannot remember a single sermon or lesson from that book. As R. Dennis Cole cleverly points out in his commentary, “The Book of Numbers has been neglected in evangelical circles . . . Preaching from this text is relegated to the Balaam stories and oracles, the rebellious spy account, and an occasional reference to the Nazirite material to support a sermon on alcoholism.”[1] The problem with this neglect is shown by Ronald Allen’s intricate discussion against “critical ideas of source criticism” when he states in defense of the authority of the book that:

For those who take the concepts of Scripture and canon seriously, the book of Numbers may take on an increasing significance. Evangelical Christian theologians have long paraded their conviction that the Scriptures are the result of the outbreathing of God, or “inspiration.” Indeed we stand or fall on this conviction.[2]

He goes on to note that while most evangelicals would agree with the concept of the inspiration of the book of Numbers in principle, far too often they neglect it in the practical application that should be implied by it’s divine origin. To evangelicals then, contemporary application of the book of Numbers is not merely important; it is a central matter of faith.

I have faced this ignorance of the value book of Numbers in the evangelical world many times in my path towards becoming a pastor of an inner-city post-modern church-plant. In seminary besides the most general of discussions in Old Testament Survey classes, I only remember the book being significantly mentioned once.[3] During college I was involved in InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, and unfortunately, in their LifeGuides Bible study books, they do not offer a volume on the book of Numbers. Even in the world of the arts, only contemporary Christian song I heard that included a theme from the book of Numbers was the one in which Rich Mullins discusses the Balaam incident.[4] In all fairness to the evangelical world, I don’t know whether any other religious movement gives fair emphasis to this particular book of the Bible, with the possible exception of Orthodox Judaism through their intense emphasis on the entire Torah.

So, why is the book ignored by evangelicals? Allen argues that it is the plethora of critical issues that face the scholar.[5] This theory is supported by the classic introduction to the commentary put together by Driver, Plummer, and Briggs which deals exclusively with these critical issues.[6] Indeed, it is easy to get lost in the scholarly and critical issues, and miss entirely the authoritative practical applications that God desires to communicate through that part of the canon.

Along similar lines, Cole argues that the lack of application emanates a non-existent “comprehension of the composition and framework” of the book.[7] In other words, Cole thinks that Christians avoid applying the book because they have a difficult time sorting through its opaque structure. Problems in comprehending the basic elements and structure of any work can make applying it quite a bit more challenging. Perhaps, however, these problems were more severe in a modernist setting where structure and understanding of detail were held in very high esteem. Indeed, it may be easier for post-modern deconstructionists to deal with the complicated text and outline of this narrative book in the canon.

Gordon Wenham argues in the preface to his commentary that there are significant problems even with the book’s title. He states that, “in ancient times numbers were seen as mysterious and symbolic . . . . Today they are associated with computers and the depersonalization that threatens our society.”[8] Thus, the preconceived notions of what numbers mean in contemporary society and the sizable census lists in the book make studying the book a daunting challenge for some contemporary Christian exegetes.

So, for a variety of reasons, the Book of Numbers is often ignored in our churches, ministries, and Christian religious institutions. This unfortunate situation means that we are missing out on the spiritual blessings that God wants to bestow on us when we study his Scriptures.

Because of the general disregard for this book, nearly every commentary and every preacher or teacher who decides to study this book finds it necessary to discuss the merits of knowing more about this piece of “salvation history.”[9] Indeed, after a careful examination of this material, I have found that this book not only is valuable for all Christians to study but it has a special value to followers of Jesus in a post-modern society. Interestingly, B. Maarsingh does not give an argument for why the book of Numbers should be studied in the introduction to his commentary. Indeed, his sub-title and later content perhaps adequately observes the book’s importance: Numbers: a Practical Commentary.[10]

The sheer value of this work to Christians in any situation is nearly obvious once the book is studied with appropriate hermeneutics. Allen advances the idea that “the theme of the Book of Numbers is worship.”[11] While there are many different themes in this book, he has suggested one that is of importance to contemporary Christians. Indeed, with all the discussion and debate about worship in evangelical churches in the last quarter of a century, a more Scriptural study on the topic with less sheer dogma would help to put the debate in a more useful light.

Cole argues that “the cyclical structure of the contents evidence [sic.] the contrasting themes of God’s revelation and humanity’s response.”[12] Again, this significant theme in the book could be utilized in the frequent contemporary theological debates about God’s sovereignty and human responsibility. So, the value of the book to all Christians cannot only be seen in the liturgical sense that Allen mentions but also on an intentionally theological level. Indeed, this question has haunted Christian theologians for centuries, and if the book of Numbers can help find a compromise or at least a better understanding of the issue, then studying the book is clearly valuable.

R.K. Harrison quotes an old hymn about the value of the book of Numbers for evangelicals in illustrating “the Christian’s journey through life under the Lord’s guidance.”[13] This concept of hope and God’s persistent presence in the wilderness is a theme in which Christians of all eras can discover encouragement.

On a more epistemological level Philip J. Budd argues that:

The importance of the OT, as with other ancient literature, lies in the capacity to reflect at a deep level the persistent problems and aspirations of communities across the centuries and across cultures, and to speak constructively to them.[14]

Historical works have value in our everyday lives. History provides us with a laboratory to observe human behavior under specific sets of conditions. The book of Numbers gives us the story of an ancient people as they face the challenges and blessings of a life of faith. Thus, are lessons that all Christians can learn from this historical laboratory.

Beyond the value of the book of Numbers to all Christians, two authors demonstrate its particular value in a post-modern world. Dennis Olson, after describing Origen’s patristic defense of this book[15], goes on to discuss Gary Eberle’s post-modern explanation of the need for Numbers. He states that Eberle:

argues that many who live today in the so-called postmodern world have lost the sense of being rooted in a “spiritual geography” that helped previous generations... the image of traveling through the wilderness may become an important biblical image to recapture in our time.... the book of Numbers is a particularly helpful resource for recapturing this wilderness image and its many implications for a postmodern world.[16]

Thus, those of us wandering in a post-modern no-mans-land can discover a special kind of solidarity with and hope in the Hebrew people as they wander fitfully towards God’s promises. Indeed, this kind of hope even in the face of rebellion, difficulty, and disappointment, is something post-modern Christians need. In the wilderness God is not only aiding his followers and pointing them towards their ultimate hope but is also present with them in a special and visible way.

Perhaps the best demonstration of the value of the book of Numbers to post-modern Christians comes quite unintentionally in Gordon Wenham’s commentary. He discusses in detail the value of rituals in the Torah and his anthropological method for understanding them.[17] In the middle of his discussion he notes the following:

Though these rituals may be likened to television, the analogy is rather weak. Television may be vivid, but it does not permit spectator participation, which is the essence of Old Testament rituals. Everyone involved had to play his own role on a public stage under the eyes of man and God.[18]

Indeed, in many ways Old Testament rituals are more closely related to virtual reality video games or even reality television (where the audience votes for the winner) than they are to regular network TV. Not only do they “express religious truths visually as opposed to verbally,”[19] but they involve the ‘audience’ in the reality of what is occurring. Leonard Sweet, both in many of his published works (including Soul Tsunami) and in a lecture he presented, argues that worship in a post-modern world must include experience, participation, imagery, and community (EPIC).[20] The worship rituals described in Numbers include all of these aspects that post-moderns find vital. So as evangelical Christians are actively rethinking what their worship event should be in post-modern context, it would be wise to study the book of Numbers (and the rest of the Torah) and observe how God used these very elements in the ancient past to help his tribal people connect with him.

Therefore, the book of Numbers not only has value as an important piece of history and a book with themes that are generally encouraging to all Christians, but a couple of its central themes, participatory worship and wilderness wandering, are particularly and spiritually vital to those in the post-modern world. This should not be surprising to evangelicals, who have said all along with the Apostle Paul, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the man of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.”[21] May God always bless the study of His Word with practical applications that transform our lives, no matter what context in which we find ourselves!


[1] R. Dennis Cole, Numbers, The New American Commentary, Volume 3B, Nashville: Broadman, 2000, page 16.
[2] Ronald B. Allen, Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Volume 2, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1990, pages 658 – 659.
[3] Dr. Calvin Miller applied its generational theme to the tensions between “Baby Boomers” and “genXers” in the contemporary church. Dr. Calvin Miller, Church Growth Evangelism Class, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, lectures spring 1999.
[4] Rich Mullins, “Who God is Going to Use.” The World As Best as I Can Remember It, Edward Grant, 1991. He also refers to the pillar and cloud that shows up througout the Torah in "Every where I go I see you."
[5] Allen, 658.
[6] S.R. Driver, A. Plummer, C.A.Briggs, Numbers, International Critical Commentary, Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1903, 1986.
[7] Cole, 16.
[8] Gordon J. Wenham, Numbers, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries, Volume 4, Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1981, page 9.
[9] Allen, 657.
[10] B.Marrsingh, Numbers: A Practical Commentary, Trans.by John Vriend, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1987.
[11] Allen, 658.
[12] Cole, 52.
[13] R.K. Harrison, Numbers, Wycliffe Exegetical Commentary, Chicago: Moody Press, 1990, page 28.
[14] Philip J. Budd, Numbers, Word Biblical Commentary, Volume 5, Waco, TX: Word, 1984, page xxxi.
[15] Dennis T. Olson, Numbers, Interpretation, Louisville: John Knox, 1986, page 1.
[16] Olson, 2.
[17] Wenham, 32.
[18] Wenham, 29.
[19] Wenham, 29.
[20] Leonard Sweet, Lecture at Northwood a Church of the Communities, Texas, May 2000.
[21] 2 Timothy 3: 16 – 17, New International Version, Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1995.

Thursday, July 06, 2006

Vision Poem for C3

The pulses of originality beat

Art and wonder, grime and horror are here

The angry scream, the hopeless drink their fear

Here in this unique place the tribes all meet

The pounding of a million wing-tipped feet

Rushing from the train to their home that’s near

In fatigue they stop to enjoy a beer

The aggrandized have their lazy-boy seat

Yet He still haunts the alleys and the lights

Longing to woo them to his bleeding arms

And give them what they forget they long for

Teaching them joy in surrendering rights

Endowing peace in the midst of alarms

We will show them how to open the door.

Pluralism and the Emerging Church

I am the pastor of a small church in center city Chicago. My wife and I moved to Chicago 6 years ago to start this church. In some ways I suppose we are what would be called an “emerging church.” We host a quarterly goth night, we look for many other creative ways to reach out to this highly post-modern, post-Christian, post-gentrification culture, we value relationships and sincerity. In other ways I am sure we are dinosaurs: we have use of a church building, I minister in the church full time, we have a cell group outreach strategy, our worship service has some traditional evangelical elements to it, and we even have a purpose statement (though in fairness to us it is focused on discipleship). Despite these idiosyncrasies, I am now often encouraged to speak in various arenas (research, media, denominational associations, sponsoring churches) concerning the emerging church.

With this new found voice, I figured it would be wise for me to become better versed in emerging lingo. In the past reading articles on the OOZE has sufficed, but I supposed that I needed something slightly more academically intense. I picked up Brian McLaren’s work a Generous Orthodoxy and began to read looking for some kind of theological explanation of this movement in which we currently find ourselves.

What I found instead was what I consider the most important topic for us to begin to actually discuss in this emerging dialogue. While some of what he mentioned demonstrated his basic genius and good humor, much of his argument drifted disturbingly close to pluralism. In the name of being friendly, he almost dismissed the uniqueness of Jesus’ work through his bride the Church (check out chapter 17). Now, I fully understand the warnings against uber-critique in his chapter 0, but I also sensed in his tone a desire to spark conversation. Perhaps this would be a good forum to reopen that dialogue.

In chapter 8 (pages 145 and forward) McLaren argues that what polarized the church in the hyper-conceptualist modern era was our view of the authority of the Scriptures. He argued that both fundamentalists and liberals were trying in their own ways to address the basic questions of modernity through using modernity’s own tools. Perhaps a similar polarization lies in the future of the emerging movement. Let’s hope we can have a more healthy and productive dialogue than the debates that erupted in the modern era. Beyond that, however, let’s pray that we take as seriously as the modern evangelicals the preserving of the uniqueness of the Christian faith. Evangelicals offer more than just their passion that he discusses in chapter 7. They made many mistakes, and I am sure we are making many now, but over all it is fairly impressive that Christianity survived the modern threat, and much of that we owe to the tenacity of the “fundamentalists.”

The polarization I expect in the emerging dialogue will come down to this question: Is a relationship with Jesus in the context of the Christian community the only way to experience Jesus’ offer of eternal life? Note that this question is far more relational in nature than what our forbearers debated. Are we going to be wholeheartedly loyal to Jesus as his disciples, or are we going to open ourselves up to gaining spirituality from various other religious and secular sources?

Clearly the issue of pluralism –vs- exclusivism is not one we can avoid, especially as we reach out to people who have been deeply impacted by other religious systems. We can either choose to absorb their beliefs and practices and become a kind of religious buffet, or we can challenge their sub-Christian values (as we do our own worldly values) with intentional relational discipleship. We hope and pray that as our dialogue continues the emerging movement will lean more and more towards an exclusive focus on Jesus. While other religious should be treated respectfully, and at times may have some wisdom to offer (all truth is God’s truth), they simply are not completely affirming to the basic teachings and attitudes that Jesus desires for his disciples to reflect. As his disciples we are required to treat people with true love… a loving response when someone is mistaken in their core beliefs is to gently and relationally confront those issues, and help them discover the truth, not to simply leave them where they are.

If you want what Jesus offers, you can only get that through who he is and what he has done.

NIV Acts 4:12 Salvation is found in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved."